Quixotic Imagery in Ideological Mythmaking


  • Oleksandr Pronkevych




Ideology, ideological mythmaking, archetype, word-progenitor, quixotic discourse, Romantic Don Quixote


Each ideology has its own system of symbolic representation, which contributes to establishing hegemonies in the minds of human beings in the struggle with other ideologies. Literary imagery is an important part of ideological mythmaking. It provides creators of ideologies with lists of authors, citations, and characters of famous works of verbal art, which become icons of certain political, religious, esthetical values, beliefs, and principles. However, the semiotic mechanism of converting literary imagery into ideological myths is not clear. To address this question this paper focuses on the case of Don Quixote, as Cervantes’s protagonist has become the front man of numerous ideologies that contradict each other.


Bagno, Vsevolod. Don Kikhot v Rossii i russkoe donkihotsvo [Don Quixote in Russia and Russian Quixotic Myth]. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2009.

Bagno, Vsevolod. “El utopismo como base de la metalidad quijotesca, y del quijotismo mundial.” AIH. Actas (1995): 28–32.

Bagno, Vsevolod, and Marina Koreneva. Vozhdi umov i mody. Chuzhoe imia kak nasleduemaia model zhizni [Chiefs of Minds and Fashion. The Alien Name as Model of Imitating Life]. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2003.

Blasco, Javier. “La Vida de don Quijote y Sancho o lo que habría ocurrido ‘si don Quijote hubiese en tiempo de Miguel de Unamuno vuelto al mundo.” Letras hispanas 1 (2004): 55–69.

Close, Anthony. The Romantic Approach to Don Quixote. Critical History of the Romantic Tradition in “Quixote” Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

Cull, Nicholas J. et al. Propaganda and Mass Persuasion. A Historical Encyclopedia, 1500 to the Present. Santa Barbara, California, Denver, Colorado, Oxford, England: ABC-CLIO, Inc., 2003.

Entsiklopedia literaturnykh proizvedenii [Encyclopedia of Literary Works]. Moscow: Vagrius, 1998.

Jost, John T. et al. “Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities.” Annual Review of Psychology 60 (2009): 307–37.