Unravelling the Ukrainian Revolution: “Dignity,” “Fairness,” “Heterarchy,” and the Challenge to Modernity
Keywords:Ukraine, Revolution, Euromaidan, personalism, dignity, heterarchy
AbstractUkraine’s “Revolution of Dignity,” spanning both the 2013–2014 protests in Kyiv’s city center and the mass mobilization of grass-roots resistance against Russian aggression in 2014–2015 and thereafter, manifest new interpretations of ideas and philosophical concepts. In the first part of the article we unravel the meaning of the Ukrainian word hidnist (roughly translated as “dignity”) – a moniker of the revolution whose significance remains underestimated. In the second part we situate Ukraine’s revolution within a broader context of “modernity” and suggest its individualist foundation may be replaced by a form of “personalism” – an ethic that echoes that of Ukraine’s revolutionaries. In the third part of the article, we delve into the substance of the revolution’s agenda: its protagonists’ promise to build a non-hierarchical community of “fairness” (spravedlyvist). In the fourth and final section, the main argument of the article is summarized, namely: that the shift from individualism to personalism in social interaction and the transition from hierarchy to heterarchy in power relations, particularly with respect to institutionalizing “fairness,” embodied in the various structures and organizations formed during Ukraine’s Revolution of Dignity, may have been reflective of more comprehensive trends in ideational change affecting European (Western) civilization.
Adair-Toteff, Christopher. “Max Weber’s Charisma.” Journal of Classical Sociology 5.2 (2005): 189–204.
Aquas, Jove Jim S. “The Notions of the Human Person and Human Dignity in Aquinas and Wojtyla.” Kritike 3.1 (2009): 40–60.
Arendt, Hannah. On Revolution. New York: The Viking Press, 1963.
Braudel, Fernand. Civilization and Capitalism, 15th–18th Century. 3 vols. New York: Harper and Row, 1981–1984.
Chaban, Vasylyna M. “Kontseptosfera hidnist v ukrainskii linhvokulturi [The Concept of Dignity in Ukrainian Linguoculture].” Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu “Ostrozka akademiia” 48 (2014): 119–22.
Dymyd, Mykhailo, and Klymentiia Dymyd. Kaminnia Maidanu [Stones of Maidan]. Lviv: Svichado, 2014.
Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah. Comparative Civilizations and Multiple Modernities. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2003.
Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah. The Great Revolutions and the Civilizations of Modernity. Leiden: Brill, 2006.
“Enerhozberezhennia: shcho robyty i de vziaty hroshi? [Energy Conservation: What Needs Doing and Where is Funding to Come From?].” Teplo.gov.ua, August 14, 2016. http://teplo.gov.ua/energoefektivnist/poradi-shchodo-energozberezhennya/enerhozberezhennya.html.
Friedland, William H. “For a Sociological Concept of Charisma.” Social Forces 43.1 (1964): 18–26.
Mounier, Emmanuel. Personalism. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1989.
Plokhy, Serhii. The Cossack Myth: History and Nationhood in the Age of Empires. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation. New York: Farrar & Rinehart, 1944.
Rosen, Michael. Dignity: Its History and Meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012.
Rosen, Michael. “Dignity Past and Present.” In Dignity, Rank, and Rights, edited by Jeremy Waldron, 79–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Rourke, Thomas R., and Rosita A. Chazarretta Rourke. A Theory of Personalism. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2005.
Rozhen, Oleksandr. “Chy zavazhaie nasha mentalnist zhyttievomu uspikhu? [“Does Our Mentality Hinder Success in Life?”]. Dzerkalo Tyzhnia, May 24, 2002. https://zn.ua/ukr/science/chi_zavazhae_nasha_mentalnist_zhittevomu_uspihu.html.
Sandel, Michael J. Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2010.
Shils, Edward. “Charisma, Order, and Status.” American Sociological Review 30.2 (1965): 199–213.
Skocpol, Theda. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
Smith, Christian. What is a Person? Rethinking Humanity, Social Life, and the Moral Good from the Person Up. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.
Toftul, M. H. Etyka [Ethics]. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi tsentr “Akademiia,” 2005.
“V Ukraini dozvolyly puskaty vidviduvachiv do patsiientiv v reanimatsii [Visitors Have Been Allowed Access to Intensive Care Patients in Ukraine].” Ukrainska Pravda, June 29, 2016. https://life.pravda.com.ua/health/2016/06/29/214428/.
Waldron, Jeremy. Dignity, Rank, and Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Weber, Max. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Talcott Parsons. New York: Allen and Unwin, 1930.
Weber, Max. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press, 1947.
Williams, Thomas D., and Jan Olof Bengtsson. “Personalism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Last modified January 8, 2020. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/personalism/.
Wynnyckyj, Mychailo. “The 1996 Constitution of Ukraine: A Reflection of the Values of the Political Elite.” MPhil dissertation, Cambridge University, 1997.
Wynnyckyj, Mychailo. “Ukraine 2006–2007: Building Elite Consensus through Conflict.” In Ukraine on its Meandering Path Between East and West, edited by Andrej N. Lushnycky and Mykola Riabchuk, 113–36. Bern: Peter Lang, 2009.
Wynnyckyj, Mychailo. Ukraine’s Maidan, Russia’s War: A Chronicle and Analysis of the Revolution of Dignity. Stuttgart: Ibidem Press, 2019.
“Yak pratsiuie inkluzyvna osvita v ukrainskikh shkolakh [How Does Inclusive Education in Ukraine Function].” 24 Kanal, December 18, 2017. https://24tv.u/yak_pratsyuye_inklyuzivna_osvita_v_ukrayinskih_shkolah_n903519.
Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal provides free access to original research without restriction barriers (i.e. subscription fees, licensing fees etc.). The journal allows re-use of content for non-commercial/educational purposes indexing the source.
Unless otherwise indicated, content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, which means you are free to:
and make commercial use of the work
...provided that any use is made with attribution to author(s) and Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal.
The author passes copyright of the article to the journal and Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal; author can archive post-print articles (PDF versions) on s/he web-site (http://www.sherpa.ac.uk).