Ukrainian Investigative Journalists After the Euromaidan: Their Role Conceptions and Worldviews


  • Oleksandr Yaroshchuk



Investigative journalism, role conceptions, professional culture, watchdog journalism, journalism in Ukraine, Euromaidan


In recent years, an increased interest in journalistic roles has inspired multiple empirical studies aimed at establishing the journalistic role conception and performance of journalists worldwide. Ukraine is not an exception. Studies published in recent years show that the professional culture of journalists in Ukraine is changing, resulting in the “blurring of boundaries” between journalism and activism. Moreover, Ukrainian journalists also show a high degree of political engagement. However, these studies have not measured the specific professional settings of investigative journalists, who form a unique community in the Ukrainian media system. Therefore, this study is devoted to uncovering the role conceptions of Ukrainian investigative journalists, their professional identities, and culture. The results show that many journalists express multiple roles: a “populist mobilizer” combined with “watchdog” role, or “watchdog” combined with “critical change agent” role. This confirms the hypothesis that a multiplicity of roles and blurring of boundaries are also present among investigative journalists.


Budivska, Halyna, and Dariya Orlova. “Between Professionalism and Activism: Ukrainian Journalism After the Euromaidan.” Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal 3 (2017): 137–56.

Cassidy, William P. “Variations on a Theme: The Professional Role Conceptions of Print and Online Newspaper Journalists.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 82.2 (2015): 264–80.

Christians, Clifford G., et al. Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2009.

Cohen, Bernard C. Press and Foreign Policy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1963.

Coronel, Sheila S. “Corruption and the Watchdog Role of the News Media.” In Public Sentinel: News Media and Governance Reform, edited by Pippa Norris, 111–37. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2010.

Deuze, Mark. “What is Journalism? Professional Identity and Ideology of Journalists Reconsidered.” Journalism 6.4 (2005): 442–64.

Donsbach, Wolfgang. “Journalists’ Role Perception.” In The International Encyclopedia of Communication, edited by Wolfgang Donsbach, 2605–10. Oxford, UK; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008.

Donsbach, Wolfgang, and Thomas E. Patterson. “Political News Journalists: Partisanship, Professionalism, and Political Roles in Five Countries.” In Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges, edited by Frank Esser & Barbara Pfetsch, 251–70. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Dovzhenko, Maryna. “Ne boiatysia siroho vovka: hromadianskyi mediaaktyvizm v Ukraini [Not to be Afraid of a Grey Wolf: Civic Media Activism in Ukraine].” School of Journalism at the Ukrainian Catholic University, December 15, 2015.

Dovzhenko, Otar. “Ukrainski media siohodni: z haremu v bordel [Ukrainian Media Today: From Harem to Brothel].” Detector Media, May 26, 2008.

Dyczok, Marta. “Do the Media Matter? Focus on Ukraine.” In Media, Democracy and Freedom. The Post-Communist Experience, edited by Marta Dyczok and Oxana Gaman-Golutvina, 17–41. Bern: Peter Lang AG, 2009.

Hanitzsch, Thomas. “Populist Disseminators, Detached Watchdogs, Critical Change Agents and Opportunist Facilitators: Professional Milieus, the Journalistic Field and Autonomy in 18 Countries.” International Communication Gazette 73.6 (2011): 477–94.

Hanitzsch, Thomas, et al. “Mapping Journalism Culture Across Nations.” Journalism Studies 12.3 (2011): 273–93.

Hanitzsch, Thomas. “Professional Identity and Roles of Journalists.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, October 26, 2017.

Hanitzsch, Thomas. “Deconstructing Journalism Culture: Toward a Universal Theory.” Communication Theory 17 (2007): 367–85.

Hanitzsch, Thomas. “Mapping Journalism Culture: A Theoretical Taxonomy and Case Studies from Indonesia.” Asian Journal of Communication 16.2 (2006): 169–86.

Horbyk, Roman. “In Pursuit of Kairos: Ukrainian Journalists Between Agency and Structure During Euromaidan.” Baltic Worlds 12.1 (2019): 4–19.

Janowitz, Morris. “Professional Models in Journalism: The Gatekeeper and the Advocate.” Journalism Quarterly 52.4 (1975): 618–26.

Johnstone, John W. C., Edward J. Slawski, and William W. Bowman. “The Professional Values of American Newsmen.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36.4 (1972): 522–40.

Kholodenko, Olena. “Nataliia Ligachova: ‘Samaia opasnaia zavisimost segodnia dlia zhurnalista – eto zavisimost ot sobstvennych ubezhdeniy’ [Nataliia Ligachova: ‘The Most Dangerous Addiction for a Journalist Today is Dependence on Their Own Beliefs].” Detector Media, December 20, 2017.

Kocher, Renate. “Bloodhounds or Missionaries: Role Definitions of German and British Journalists.” European Journal of Communication 1 (1986): 43–64.

Krzyżanowski, Michał. “Values, Imaginaries, and Templates of Journalistic Practice: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” Social Semiotics 24 (2014): 345–65.

Kvit, Serhiy. “Ukraine Has Never Given Up and Never Will.” Kyiv Post, February 1, 2020.

Lewis, Seth C. “The Tension Between Professional Control and Open Participation: Journalism and its Boundaries.” Information, Communication, and Society 16.6 (2012): 1–31.

Mancini, Paolo. “Political Complexity and Alternative Models of Journalism.” In De-Westernizing Media Studies, edited by J. Curran and Myung-Jin Park, 234–35. London; New York: Routledge, 2000.

Mellado, Claudia, and Arjen van Dalen. “Changing Times, Changing Journalism: A Content Analysis of Journalistic Role Performances in a Transitional Democracy.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 22 (2017): 244–63.

Nayyem, Mustafa. “Ladno, davaite seriozno…[Okay, Let’s Take it Seriously…].” Facebook, November 21, 2013.

Neil, Jebril. “Is Watchdog Journalism Satisfactory Journalism? A Cross-National Study of Public Satisfaction With Political Coverage.” Working paper, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford, 2013. Accessed March 15, 2020.

Orlova, Dariya. “Ukrainian Media After the EuroMaidan: In Search of Independence and Professional Identity.” Publizistik 61.4 (2016): 441–61.

Ryabinska, Natalya. “Media Capture in Post-Communist Ukraine.” Problems of Post-Communism 61.2 (2014): 46–60.

Salovaara-Moring, Inka. “Beyond East and West: Alternative Spheres of Journalism, Capitalism and Public.” In Manufacturing Europe: Spaces of Democracy, Diversity and Communication, edited by Inka Salovaara-Moring, 97–116. Gothenburg: Nordicom, 2009.

Schmidt, Vivien. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11.1 (2008): 303–26.

Shoemaker, Pamela J., and Stephen D. Reese. Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. New York: Longman, 1996.

Van Dalen, Arjen, Claes H. de Vreese, and Erik Albaek. “Different Roles, Different Content? A Four Country Comparison of the Role Conceptions and Reporting Style of Political Journalists.” Journalism 13.7 (2012): 903–22.

Vos, Tim. “Journalistic Role Conception: A Bridge Between the Reporter and the Press.” Paper presented at the International Communication Association (ICA) Conference, New York, May 2005.

Waisbord, Silvio. Watchdog Journalism in South America. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.

Willnat, Lars, David H. Weaver, and Jihyang Choi. “The Global Journalist in the Twenty-First Century: A Cross-National Study of Journalistic Competencies.” Journalism Practice 7.2 (2013): 163–83.

Weaver, David H., Lars Willnat, and G. Cleveland Wilhoit. “The American Journalist in the Digital Age: Another Look at U.S. News People.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 96.1 (2019): 101–30.