“Philosophy of Humanism and Enlightenment”: Kant and Neo-Kantians in Yevhen Spektorskyi’s Investigations into Philosophy of Social Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18523/2313-4895.11.2024.46-70Keywords:
Kant, Neo-Kantian Philosophy, history of philosophy, philosophy of social sciences, ethics, methodology of science, Yevhen Spektorskyi, Bohdan Kistiakivskyi, Kyiv academic philosophyAbstract
The article explores the influence of Kantian and Neo-Kantian philosophy on a prominent philosopher and educator, Yevhen Vasyliovych Spektorskyi’s (1875–1951) views regarding the nature and methodology of social sciences. First, it explores Spektorskyi’s consideration of Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) as a philosopher of science, emphasizing the critical aspect of his philosophy and its significant prospects for ethics and social philosophy. Next, it investigates how Spektorskyi became acquainted with and was influenced by Neo-Kantian philosophy, especially the Marburg school. The main problem through the lens of which Spektorskyi analyzed their achievements was the idea of “pure” ethics as a firm foundation for social science, while criticizing Herman Cohen (1842–1918) for claiming this foundation to lie in jurisprudence. Despite being an adherent of the Baden school, Bohdan Kistiakivskyi (1868–1920) presented views that were quite similar to Spektorskyi’s regarding the exceptional status and methods of social science. The emphasis on logical procedures and the need for rational discussion allows us to draw a parallel between Spektorskyi and the development of Kantian ideas in the 20th-century communicative philosophy. The justification of the “moral” sciences led Spektorskyi to criticize the Baden Neo-Kantians, advocating for the moral nature of social sciences and their importance in constructing social reality. The project of rational social science aimed at governance and politics is reminiscent of Kant’s “anthroponomy”.
References
Apel, Karl-Otto. The Response of Discourse Ethics to the Moral Challenge of the Human Situation as Such and Especially Today (Mercier Lectures, Louvain-la-Neuve, March 1999). Peeters Publishers, 2001.
Cassirer, Ernst. Leibniz’ System in seinen wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen. Marburg an der Lahn: G. Elwert, 1902.
Cassirer, Ernst. Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit, Band I. Berlin, 1906.
Cassirer, Ernst. Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit, Band IІ. Berlin, 1907.
Falkenburg, Brigitte. “On Method: The Fact of Science and the Distinction between Natural Science and the Humanities”. Kant Yearbook 12, no. 1 (2020): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1515/kantyb-2020-0001
Gawronsky, Dimitry. “Ernst Cassirer: His Life and His Work”. In Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, 1–38. Evanston, Illinois: The Library Living Philosophers inc., 1949.
Habermas, Jürgen. Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Translated by Ciaran Cronin. The MIT Press, 1994.
Kistyakovskii, Bogdan. Izbrannoe [Selected Works]. Edited by A. N. Medushevskii. 2 vols. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2010.
Kozlovskyi, Viktor. “Kantova antroponomіya, abo vchennya pro lyudinu yak normotvorchu іstotu” [Kant’s Anthroponomy or Human Doctrine as a Rule- proclaiming creature]. Naukovі zapiski NaUKMA. Fіlosofіya ta relіgіeznavstvo 141 (2013): 45–51.
Krupyna, Oksana. “Confirmation of the Spiritual Nature of Individual and Society in Yevhen Spektorskyi’s Works of the Emigrant Period”. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Filosofiia ta relihiieznavstvo 13 (2024): 57–66. https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-1678.2024.13.57-66.
Natorp, Paul. “Kant und die Marburger Schule” [Kant and the Marburg School]. Kant-Studien 17 (1912): 193–221.
Natorp, Paul. Decartes Erkenntnisstheorie. Eine Studie zur Vorgeschichte des Kriticismus. Marburg, 1889.
Natorp Paul, Platos Ideenlehre: eine Einführung in den Idealismus. Leipzig: Meiner, 1902.
Nemeth, Thomas. Russian Neo-Kantianism: Emergence, Dissemination, and Dissolution. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2022.
Rickert, Heinrich. Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft. Tübingen: Verlag von J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1926.
Slobodian, Oksana. “Retseptsiia idei marburzkoho neokantianstva u rannii period tvorchosti Yevhena Spektorskoho” [Reception of the Marburg Neo-Kantianism Ideas in the Early Works by Yevhen Spektorskyi]. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Filosofiia ta relihiieznavstvo 2 (2018): 35–42. https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-16782153214
Spektorskii, Yevgenii. “Entciklopediia ekonomicheskikh, iuridicheskikh i politicheskikh nauk. Kurs lektcii” [“The Encyclopaedia of Economical, Juridical and Political Sciences. Course of Lectures”]. 1903. No 31. Fond 43: Spektorskyi Yevhen Vasylovych (1875–1919). Manuscript Institute of the V. I. Vernadskyi National Library, Kyiv.
Spektorskii, Yevgenii. Ergard Veigel, zabytii ratsionalist XVII veka [Erhard Weigel, the Forgotten Rationalist of the 17th century]. Tipografiia Varshavskogo uchebnogo okruga, 1909.
Spektorskii, Yevgenii. “Iz oblasti chistoi etiki” [“From the Area of Pure Ethics”]. Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii 78 (1905): 384–411.
Spektorskii, Yevgenii. “O zadachakh obshchestvovedeniia” [“On Assessments of Social Science”]. Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii 72 (1904): 143–161.
Spektorskii, Yevgenii. “Ob obektivnosti, dostovernosti, edinstve nauki i ob obshchestvennykh naukakh. Zametki” [On Objectivity, Certainty and Unity of the Science and on Social Sciences. Notes]. No. 33. Fond 43: Spektorskyi Yevhen Vasylovych (1875–1919). Manuscript Institute of the V. I. Vernadskyi National Library, Kyiv.
Spektorskii, Yevgenii. Ocherki po filosofii obshchestvennykh nauk. Vyp. 1. Obshchestvennye nauki i teoreticheskaia Filosofia [Studies on Philosophy of Social Sciences. Number 1. Social Sciences and Theoretical Philosophy]. Warsaw, 1907.
Spektorskii, Yevgenii. “Problema chistoi etiki i ee dostovernost” [The Problem of Pure Ethics and its Certainty]. No. 31. Fond 43: Spektorskyi Yevhen Vasylovych (1875–1919). Manuscript Institute of the V. I. Vernadskyi National Library, Kyiv.
Spektorskii, Yevgenii. Problema sotcialnoi fiziki v XVII stoletii [The Problem of Social Physics in 17th Century]. 2 vols. (Saint Petersburg: Nauka, 2006).
Spektorskii, Yevgenii. “Voprosy kritiki i teorii obshchestvennikh nauk. Ocherk podgotovlennii k ІІ izd.” [The Issues of Critique and Theory of Social Sciences. A Study Prepared for the 2nd Edition]. The 1910s. No 32. Fond 43: Spektorskyi Yevhen Vasylovych (1875–1919). Manuscript Institute of the V. I. Vernadskyi National Library, Kyiv.
Spektorskii, Yevgenii. Vospominaniya [Memoirs]. Introduction by Sergei Mikhalchenko and Elena Tkachenko, comments by Sergei Mikhalchenko and Pavel Tribunovskii. Ryazan, 2020.
Spektorskii, Yevgenii. “Vstupitelnoe slovo k lektsiyam i zanyatiyam seminara po filosofii” [“An Introductory Word for Philosophy Lectures and Seminars] 1910s. No. 15. Fond 43: Spektorskyi Yevhen Vasylovych (1875–1919). Manuscript Institute of the V. I. Vernadskyi National Library, Kyiv.
Spektorskyi, Yevgen. “Kant i sotsialna filosofiia” [“Kant and Social Philosophy”]. Publication, translation and introduction by Maryna Tkachuk. Dukh i Litera 7–8 (2001): 318–341.
Stadler August, Kants Teleologie und ihre erkenntnisstheoretische Bedeutung, eine Untersuchung. Berlin, 1874.
Ulianovskyi, Vasyl, Viktor Korotkyi, and Oleksandr Skyba. Ostannii rektor Universytetu Sviatoho Volodymyra Yevhen Vasylovych Spektorskyi [The Last Rector of Saint Volodymyr University Yevhen Vasylovych Spektorskyi]. Kyiv: Kyivskyi universytet, 2007.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Oksana Krupyna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal provides free access to original research without restriction barriers (i.e. subscription fees, licensing fees etc.). The journal allows re-use of content for non-commercial/educational purposes indexing the source.
Unless otherwise indicated, content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, which means you are free to:
copy
distribute
transmit
adapt
and make commercial use of the work
...provided that any use is made with attribution to author(s) and Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal.
The author passes copyright of the article to the journal and Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal; author can archive post-print articles (PDF versions) on s/he web-site (http://www.sherpa.ac.uk).
