Hetmans’ Land Donations to the Orthodox Church: Motives and Expectations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18523/kmhj270983.2023-10.169-191Keywords:
donation, communication, hetmans, Orthodox Church, 17th–18th centuriesAbstract
Hetmans’ donations to the Orthodox Church were characteristic of the religious and political culture of the Cossack state already in the era of its emergence in the mid-17th century. In addition to other gifts, hetmans confirmed or provided Orthodox monasteries with land ownership, which was at the center of identity, power, and social prestige. It is clear that certain concrete motives, expectations, and models of behavior stood behind the hetmans’ donations of land. This article suggests considering hetmans’ donations of land to the Orthodox Church as an element of symbolic communication, in which the giver and the recipient interacted, built symbolic communicative ties, and produced centers of communication. The focus is on “communication through donations,” that is, relationships of giving. Religious motivations and the recognition of monasteries as powerful centers of prayer were determinative for the hetmans’ “communication through donations” to the monasteries. The hetmans’ giving land and other real estate to monasteries was based on “piety,” but it was done in the name of Christ-loving rulers. So, in such donations it is quite natural that state interests were prevalent, but also there were complex combinations of religious, social, and political motivations and expectations. These characteristics were evident both in a general sense and in each specific instance of gifting.
References
A Companion to Death, Burial and Remembrance in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe, c. 1300–1700, edited by Philip Booth and Elizabeth Tingle. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2021.
Berezhna, Liliia. “Dary Mazepy. Kultura podarunkiv ukrainskykh hetmaniv u systemi dyplomatychnoi komunikatsii druhoi polovyny XVII stolittia” [“Mazepa’s Gift. The Ukrainian Hetmans Culture of Presents in the System of Diplomatic Communication in the Second Part of 17th Century”]. Kyivska Akademiia 12 (2014–2015): 222–40.
Bijsterveld, Arnoud-Jan A. “The Medieval Gift as Agent of Social Bonding and Political Power: A Comparative Approach.” In Medieval Transformations: Texts, Power, and Gifts in Context, edited by Esther Cohen and Mayke B. de Jong, 123–56. Leiden; Boston; Köln: Brill, 2001.
— — —. Do ut des. Gift giving, Memoria, and Conflict Management in the Medieval Low Countries. Hilversum: Verloren, 2007.
Bovhyria, Andrii. “Kozatske istoriopysannia: viziia mynuloho i konstruiuvannia identychnostei v Hetmanshchyni XVII–XVIII st.” [“Cossack historiography: the vision of the past and the construction of identities in the Hetmanate of the 17th–18th centuries”]. In Ukrainska derzhava druhoi polovyny XVII–XVIII st.: polityka, suspilstvo, kultura, 586–628. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy, 2014.
Davis, Natalia Z. Die schenkende Gesellschaft: zur Kultur der französischen Renaissance. München: Beck; 1. Aufl. edition, 2002.
— — —. The Gift in Sixteenth-Сentury France. Oxford University Press, 2001.
Geschenke erhalten die Freundschaft: Gabentausch und Netzwerkpflege im europäischen Mittelalter: Akten des Internationalen Kolloquiums Munster, 19–20 November 2009, hrsg. von Michael Grünbart. Münster, 2011.
Komter, Aafke E. Social Solidarity and the Gift. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Mauss, Marcel. “Essay sur le don. Forme et raison de l’echange dans les societes archaiques.” L’Annee sociologique 1 (1923–1924): 30–186.
Medieval transformations: texts, power, and gifts in context, edited by Esther Cohen and Mayke B. de Jong. Leiden; Boston; Köln: Brill, 2001.
Mytsyk, Yurii. “Hetman Ivan Mazepa yak pokrovytel Pravoslavnoi tserkvy” [“Hetman Ivan Mazepa as a patron of the Orthodox Church”]. Siverianskyi litopys 6 (2006): 38–46.
Plokhy, Serhii. The Cossacks and Religion in Early Modern Ukraine. Oxford University Press, 2001.
Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiiskoi imperii s 1649 goda [Complete collection of laws of the Russian Empire since 1649]. Vol. VIII. St. Petersburg: Typ. II Otd. Sobstv. Ego Imp. Vel. Kanc., 1830.
Prokopyuk, Oksana. “Vkladnyky monastyriv Hetmanshchyny: sotsialnyi portret” [“Donators of the Monasteries in the Hetmanshchyna epoch: A Social Portrait”]. Ukrainian Historical Journal 2 (2022): 30–45.
Rusakova, Yuliia. Neavtentychni dokumenty Kyievo-Pecherskoho monastyria XVI–XVII st.: tekstolohiia i pozemelnyi aspekt pobutuvannia [Unauthentic documents of KyivPechersk Monastery in the 16th–17th centuries: textual criticism and land aspect of functioning]. Dys. ... kand. ist. nauk: 07.00.06. Kyiv: M. S. Hrushevsky Institute of Ukrainian Archeography and Source Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2008.
Rychka, Volodymyr. “Kyiv – druhyi Yerusalym” (z istorii politychnoi dumky ta ideolohii serednovichnoi Rusi) [“Kyiv is the second Jerusalem” (from the history of political thought and ideology of Medieval Rus)]. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy, 2005.
Sas, Petro. “Vidnovlennia pravoslavnoi tserkovnoi iierarkhii Kyivskoi mytropolii (1620)” [“Restoration of the Orthodox Church Hierarchy of the Kyiv Metropolitanate (1620)”]. Ukrainian Historical Journal 4 (2010): 15–39.
Shaposhnik, Viacheslav. “Prigovory o tserkovno-monastyrskom zemlevladenii v period pravleniia Ivana Groznogo” [“Verdicts on church and monastic land ownership during the reign of Ivan the Terrible”]. Khristianskoe chtenie 3 (2012): 6–31.
Smolii, Valerii, & Valerii Stepankov. “Derzhavna ekonomichna polityka ta stanovlennia natsionalnoi hospodarsko-ekonomichnoi modeli” [“State economic policy and formation of the national economic model”]. In Ukrainskyi Hetmanat: narysy istorii natsionalnoho derzhavotvorennia XVII–XVIII st. Vol. 2, 147–186. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy, 2018.
— — —. “Ekonomika kozatskoi Ukrainy (1648–1676)” [“Economy of Cossack Ukraine (1648– 1676)”]. In Ekonomichna istoriia Ukrainy: Istoryko-ekonomichne doslidzhennia. Vol. 1, 411–446. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr, 2011.
Sokyrko, Oleksii. “Skilky koshtuie porozuminnia? ‘Poklony’ ta ‘nakladky’ v ukrainskykh sudakh pershoi chverti XVIII stolittia” [“How Much for the Agreement? ‘Poklons’ and ‘Naklads’ in the Ukrainian Courts of the early 18th century”]. SOTSIUM. Almanakh sotsialnoi istorii 7 (2007): 195–209.
Stollberg-Rilinger, Barbara. “Symbolische Kommunikation in der Vormoderne. Begriffe – Thesen – Forschungsperspektiven.” Zeitschrift für historische Forschung 31, no 4 (2004): 489–527.
— — —. Rituale. Frankfurt am Main: Beltz Druckpartner, Hemsbach, 2013.
Ukraina – kozatska derzhava. Iliustrovana istoriia ukrainskoho kozatstva u 5175 fotosvitlynakh [Ukraine is a Cossack state. Illustrated history of the Ukrainian Cossacks in 5175 photographs], eds. V. Nediak, V. Shcherbak, O. Fedoruk. Kyiv: Emma, 2007.
Universaly Bohdana Khmelnytskoho 1648–1657 [Universals of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi 1648–1657], edited: I. Krypiakevych, I. Butych. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim “Alternatyvy”, 1998.
“Universaly getmana Danila Apostola” [“Universals of Hetman Danylo Apostol”]. In Materialy dlia otechestvennoi istorii, edited by M.O. Sudienko. Vol. I. Кiev: Univer. tip., 1853.
Universaly Ivana Mazepy. 1687–1709 [Universals of Ivan Mazepa. 1687–1709], edited I. Butych. Vol. 1. Kyiv; Lviv: Naukove tovarystvo im. Shevchenka u Lvovi, 2002.
Universaly Ivana Mazepy. 1687–1709 [Universals of Ivan Mazepa. 1687–1709], edited: I. Butych, V. Rynsevych. Vol. 2. Kyiv; Lviv: Naukove tovarystvo im. Shevchenka u Lvovi, 2006.
Universaly Pavla Polubotka (1722–1723) [Universals of Pavlo Polubotok], edited V. Rynsevych. Kyiv:VIPOL, 2008.
Universaly ukrainskykh hetmaniv vid Ivana Vyhovskoho do Ivana Samoilovycha (1657–1687) [Universals of Ukrainian hetmans from Ivan Vyhovsky to Ivan Samoilovych (1657–1687)], edited: I. Butych, V. Rynsevych, I. Teslenko. Kyiv; Lviv: Naukove tovarystvo im. Shevchenka u Lvovi, 2004.
Veselovskii, Stepan. “Monastyrskoe zemlevladenie v Moskovskoi Rusi vo vtoroi polovine XVI veka” [“Monastic land tenure in Muscovite Rus in the second half of the 16th century”]. Istoricheskie zapiski 10 (1941): 101–14.
Yakovenko, Natalia. “‘Hospodari vitchyzny’: uiavlennia kozatskoi ta tserkovnoi elity Hetmanatu pro pryrodu, reprezentatsiiu i oboviazky vlady (do pochatku XVIII stolittia)” [“‘Masters of the Fatherland’: the idea of the Cossack and church elite of the Hetmanate about the nature, representation, and duties of power (until the beginning of the 18th century)”]. In Natalia Yakovenko, Mirrors of Identity. Studies in the History of Concepts and Ideas in Ukraine (16th through the Early 18th Century, 397–426. Kyiv: Laurus, 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal provides free access to original research without restriction barriers (i.e. subscription fees, licensing fees etc.). The journal allows re-use of content for non-commercial/educational purposes indexing the source.
Unless otherwise indicated, content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, which means you are free to:
copy
distribute
transmit
adapt
and make commercial use of the work
...provided that any use is made with attribution to author(s) and Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal.
The author passes copyright of the article to the journal and Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal; author can archive post-print articles (PDF versions) on s/he web-site (http://www.sherpa.ac.uk).
