An Outline of Wittgenstein’s Investigation of Time: A Grammatical Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18523/2313-4895.12.2025.54-64Keywords:
philosophy of language, history of philosophy, metaphysics, epistemology, phenomenology, Wittgenstein, philosophy of time, philosophical grammarAbstract
This article is an exposition of the problem of time in the philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951). It focuses primarily on the works from his so-called middle to late period (1930–1951), which are explicitly concerned with the problem. The aim is to clarify how time is presented in his philosophy and what consequences can be drawn for the question of the reality of time from employing Wittgenstein’s approach. Wittgenstein’s thoughts on time during this period are marked by the distinction between memory-time and information-time, based on the principle of verification: the former is verified by recalling an event from memory, while the latter is obtained from an external source. From the perspective of the grammatical approach, which he developed at the time, the distinction is shown to be superfluous. Memory-time can be reduced to information-time, and inquiry into the nature of memory requires devising phenomenological descriptive language, which is contrary to Wittgenstein’s philosophical stance. Thus, only instances of information-time can be used to investigate time. However, this investigation demonstrates that the convenient philosophical approach to the problem of time is prone to misconceptions about its nature, which stem, first, from misunderstanding the language and, second, from deriving theories of time from its grammar.
References
Ambrose, A. (2001). Wittgenstein’s lectures: Cambridge, 1932–1935 (A. Ambrose, Ed.). Prometheus Books.
Augustine. (1961). Confessions (Vol. II). (W. Watts, Trans.). William Heinemann.
Gale, R. (1978). The philosophy of time: A collection of essays. Humanities Press.
Hintikka, J. (2005). Wittgenstein’s times (and ours). In F. Stadler & M. Stöltzner (Eds.), Time and history: Proceedings of the 28th International Ludwig Wittgenstein Symposium (pp. 539–556). Ontos Verlag.
Hommen, D., & Albersmeier, F. (2019). Intuitions and conceptual analysis in Wittgensteinian pragmatism. History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis, 22 (1), 72–91.
Husserl, E. (1971). “Phenomenology” Edmund Husserl’s article for the Encyclopaedia Britannica (1927): New complete translation by Richard E. Palmer. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 2 (2), 77–90.
Husserl, E. (1991). On the phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time (1893–1917). (R. Bernet, Ed., & J. B. Barnett, Trans.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kebuladze, V. (2011). Fenomenolohiya dosvidu [Phenomenology of Experience] (A. Loi, Ed.). Dukh i Litera [in Ukrainian].
King, J., & Lee, D. (1982). Wittgenstein’s lectures: Cambridge, 1930–1932 (D. Lee, Ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Levison, A. B. (1987). Events and time’s flow. Mind, 96 (383), 341–353.
McTaggart, J. M. (1908). The unreality of time. Mind, 17 (68), 457–474.
Moore, G. E. (2013). Wittgenstein’s lectures in 1930–33. In G. E. Moore, Philosophical papers (pp. 252–324). Routledge.
Schulte, J. (2005). Wittgenstein on time (1929–1933). In F. Stadler & M. Stöltzner (Eds.), Time and history: Proceedings of the 28th International Ludwig Wittgenstein Symposium (pp. 557–567). Ontos Verlag.
Waismann, F. (1979). Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle (B. McGuinness, Ed., J. Schulte, & B. McGuinness, Trans.). Harper & Row.
Wittgenstein, L. (1963). Tractatus logicophilosophicus. (D. Pears & B. McGuinness, Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Wittgenstein, L. (1975). Philosophical remarks. (R. Rhees, Ed., R. Hargreaves & R. White, Trans.). Harper & Row.
Wittgenstein, L. (2004). Philosophical grammar (R. Rhees, Ed., & A. Kenny, Trans.). Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical investigations (4th ed.) (P. Hacker & J. Schulte, Eds., G. E. Anscombe, P. Hacker, & J. Schulte, Trans.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nazar Matovka

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal provides free access to original research without restriction barriers (i.e. subscription fees, licensing fees etc.). The journal allows re-use of content for non-commercial/educational purposes indexing the source.
Unless otherwise indicated, content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, which means you are free to:
copy
distribute
transmit
adapt
and make commercial use of the work
...provided that any use is made with attribution to author(s) and Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal.
The author passes copyright of the article to the journal and Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal; author can archive post-print articles (PDF versions) on s/he web-site (http://www.sherpa.ac.uk).
