Ideologies of the Self: Constructing the Modern Ukrainian Subject in the Other’s Modernity

Authors

  • Roman Horbyk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18523/kmhj73970.2016-3.89-103

Keywords:

Ideology, subjectivity, modernity, Ukraine, Interbellum

Abstract

Postcolonial theory has recently come under critique as an interpretative scheme applied to Eastern Europe and particularly Ukraine. However, a closer look suggests that the critique applies only to some aspects of the approach, such as a focus on power relations and representations, while the key question should be rephrased as whether the Ukrainian subject was constituted as a colonial subject. A range of empirical material from 1920s Ukrainian discourses, both Soviet and émigré, is analyzed to shed light on how Ukrainians constructed their subjectivity as “a site of disorder” (Dipesh Chakrabarty), splitting themselves into uncultured peasant masses to be modernized and erased as a voiceless subaltern subject, on the one hand, and modernizing elites, on the other. This split can be understood as an epitome of the colonial condition.

References

Adamovsky, Ezequiel. “Euro-Orientalism and the Making of the Concept of Eastern Europe in France, 1810–1880.” Journal of Modern History 3 (2005): 591–628.

Bakić-Hayden, Milica. “Nesting Orientalisms: The Case of Former Yugoslavia.” Slavic Review 4 (1995): 917–31.

Bakuła, Bogusław. “Colonial and Postcolonial Aspects of Polish Discourse on the Eastern ‘Borderlands.’” In From Sovietology to Postcoloniality: Poland and Ukraine from a Postcolonial Perspective, edited by Janusz Korek, 41–60. Stockholm: Södertörns högskola, 2007.

Belafatti, Fabio. “Orientalism Reanimated: Colonial Thinking in Western Analysts’ Comments on Ukraine.” Euromaidan Press. Accessed January 21, 2016. http://euromaidanpress.com/2014/10/27/western-commentators-should-rid-themselves-of-old-prejudices-dating-back-from-the-age-of-colonialism-before-commenting-on-eastern-european-affairs/.

Bhabha, Homi. “Of Mimicry and Man: The Ambivalence of Colonial Discourse.” October 28 (1984): 125–33.

Butler, Judith. Excitable Speech: A Problem of the Performative. New York: Routledge, 1997.

Butler, Judith. Giving Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press, 2005.

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. “Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History: Who Speaks for ‘Indian’ Pasts?” Representations 37 (1992): 1–26.

Chernetsky, Vitaly. Mapping Postcommunist Cultures: Russia and Ukraine in the Context of Globalization. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 2007.

Dontsov, Dmytro. Dukh nashoi starovyny [The Spirit of Our Antiquity]. Drohobych: Vidrodhzennia, 1991.

Dontsov, Dmytro. Pidstavy nashoi polityky [Foundations of Our Policy]. New York:

Dnipro, 1957.

Dontsov, Dmytro. Natsionalizm [Nationalism]. Lviv: Nove zhyttia, 1926.

Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth. London: Penguin, 1963.

Fanon, Frantz. Peau noire, masques blancs. Paris: Éditions de Seuil, 1975.

Fiut, Aleksander. “In the Shadow of Empires: Postcolonialism in Central and Eastern Europe: Why not?” In From Sovietology to Postcoloniality: Poland and Ukraine from a Postcolonial Perspective, edited by Janusz Korek, 33–40. Stockholm: Södertörns högskola, 2007.

Foucault, Michel. The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Collège de France,1981–1982. New York: Picador, 2006.

Foucault, Michel. The Government of Self and Others: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1982–1983. New York: Picador; Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.

Gerasimov, Ilya, and Marina Mogilner. “Deconstructing Integration: Ukraine’s Postcolonial Subjectivity.” Slavic Review 4 (2015): 715–22.

Grabowicz, George G. “The Soviet and the Post-Soviet Discourses of Contemporary Ukraine: Literary Scholarship, the Humanities and the Russian-Ukrainian Interface.” In From Sovietology to Postcoloniality: Poland and Ukraine from a Postcolonial Perspective, edited by Janusz Korek, 61–82. Stockholm: Södertörns högskola, 2007.

Hall, Stuart. “The West and the Rest: Discourse and Power.” In The Indigenous Experience: Global Perspectives, edited by Roger Maaka and Chris Andersen, 165–73. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press, 2006.

Hall, Stuart. “The Spectacle of the Other.” In Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, edited by Stuart Hall, 225–87. London: Sage, 1997.

Hnatiuk, Ola. “The Negative Auto-Stereotype in Contemporary Ukrainian Discourse on Identity: Some Remarks on the Concept of ‘Ukrainian Ghetto.’” In From Sovietology to Postcoloniality: Poland and Ukraine from a Postcolonial Perspective, edited by Janusz Korek, 139–54. Stockholm: Södertörns högskola, 2007.

Horbyk, Roman. “Paper Empires. Orientalism in the Mediated Portrayals of India and Ukraine: A Case Study of British and Russian Press.” East/West 16 (2013): 203–22.

Hrytsak, Yaroslav. “The Postcolonial is not Enough.” Slavic Review 4 (2015): 732–37.

Hundorova, Tamara. “Postmodernistska fiktsiia Andrukhovycha z postkolonialnym znakom pytannia [Andrukhovych’s Postmodern Fiction with a Postcolonial Question Mark].” Suchasnist 9 (1993): 79–83.

Hundorova, Tamara. “Postcolonial Ressentiment – the Ukrainian Case.” In From Sovietology to Postcoloniality: Poland and Ukraine from a Postcolonial Perspective, edited by Janusz Korek, 103–14. Stockholm: Södertörns högskola, 2007.

Korek, Janusz. “Central and Eastern Europe from a Postcolonial Perspective.” In From Sovietology to Postcoloniality: Poland and Ukraine from a Postcolonial Perspective, edited by Janusz Korek, 5–22. Stockholm: Södertörns högskola, 2007.

Korek, Janusz. “In the Face of the West and the East – the Formation of the Identity of the Polish Intelligentsia After the End of World War II.” In From Sovietology to Postcoloniality: Poland and Ukraine from a Postcolonial Perspective, edited by Janusz Korek, 229–69. Stockholm: Södertörns högskola, 2007.

Kovačević, Nataša. Narrating Post/Communism: Colonial Discourse and Europe’s Borderline Civilization. London: Routledge, 2008.

Mbembe, Achille. “African Modes of Self-Writing.” Public Culture 14 (2002): 239–73.

Moore, David Chioni. “Is the Post in Postcolonial the Post- in Post-Soviet? Towards a Global Postcolonial Critique.” PMLA 116 (2001): 111–28.

Pavlyshyn, Marko. “Shcho peretvoriuietsia v ‘Rekreatsiiakh’ Yuriia Andrukhovycha? [What Is Recreated in Yurii Andrukhovych’s Recreations?].” Suchasnist 12 (1993): 115–45.

Riabchuk, Mykola. “‘Two Ukraines’ Reconsidered: The End of Ukrainian Ambivalence?” Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 15 (2015): 138–56.

Riabchuk, Mykola. “In Bed with an Elephant: Cultural Wars and Rival Identities in Contemporary Ukraine.” In From Sovietology to Postcoloniality: Poland and Ukraine from a Postcolonial Perspective, edited by Janusz Korek, 155–76. Stockholm: Södertörns högskola, 2007.

Riabchuk, Mykola. Dvi Ukrainy: realni mezhi, virtualni viiny [Two Ukraines: Real Borders, Virtual Wars]. Kyiv: Krytyka, 2003.

Said, Edward. Orientalism. New York: Random House, 2000.

Schimmelpenninck van der Oye, David. Russian Orientalism: Asia in the Russian Mind from Peter the Great to the Emigration. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010.

Shevelov, Yurii. “Moskva, Maroseika.” In Z istorii nezakinchenoi viiny, edited by Oksana Zabuzhko, 63–70. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim “Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia,” 2009.

Shkandrij, Myroslav. “The Postcolonial Moment in Ukrainian Writing.” In From Sovietology to Postcoloniality: Poland and Ukraine from a Postcolonial Perspective, edited by Janusz Korek, 83–92. Stockholm: Södertörns högskola, 2007.

Shkandrij, Myroslav. Modernists, Marxists and the Nation: The Ukrainian Literary Discussion of the 1920s. Edmonton: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press, 1992.

Smolych, Yurii. “Iohansen.” In Rechnyk ukrainskoi kultury. Mike Johansen u spohadakh, lystakh, materialakh, edited by I.M. Lysenko, 49–91. Kyiv: Rada, 2003.

Snyder, Timothy. “Integration and Disintegration: Europe, Ukraine and the World.” Slavic Review 4 (2015): 692–707.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorti. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In The Postcolonial Studies Reader, edited by B. Aschcroft, G. Griffiths and H. Tiffin, 28–37. London; New York: Routledge, 2006.

Thompson, Ewa. Imperial Knowledge: Russian Literature and Colonialism. Westport: Greenwood Press, 2000.

Tlostanova, Madina. A Janus-Faced Empire. Notes on the Russian Empire in Modernity, Written from the Border. Moscow: Blok, 2003.

Tlostanova, Madina. “Postsocialist ≠ Postcolonial? On Post-Soviet Imaginary and Global Coloniality.” Journal of Postcolonial Writing 2 (2012): 130–42.

Tlostanova, Madina. “The Imperial-Colonial Chronotope: Istanbul–Baku–Khurramabad.” In Globalisation and the Decolonial Option, edited by Walter D. Mignolo and Arturo Escobar, 260–81. London; New York: Routledge, 2013.

Todorova, Maria. “On Public Intellectuals and Their Conceptual Frameworks.” Slavic Review 4 (2015): 708–14.

Tolz, Vera. Russia’s Own Orient: The Politics of Identity and Oriental Studies in the Late Imperial and Early Soviet Period. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Wolff, Larry. Inventing Eastern Europe: The Map of Civilization on the Mind of Enlightenment. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994.

Yekelchyk, Serhy. Stalin’s Empire of Memory: Russian-Ukrainian Relations in the Soviet Historical Imagination. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles